1. Project Overview
| Dimension | Information |
|---|---|
| Projects | microsoft/agent-framework |
| Positioning | Production-grade AI agents and multi-agent workflows |
| Core competencies | Agents, Workflows, Providers, Tools/MCP, Middleware, Observability, Checkpoint, Human-in-the-loop |
| Supported languages | Python, C#/.NET |
| Open Source Protocol | README and GitHub information is shown as MIT |
| Python Package | 'agent-framework',PyPI query returns version '1.9.0 ',Python requires'>= 3.10 ' |
| . NET Package | 'Microsoft. Agents.AI',NuGet query returns version '1.11.1 ' |
| Official | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/ |
| GitHub Heat | GitHub API Triggers Anonymous Flow Limit This Time; Previously, 2026-06-30 queried about 11.8k stars and 2.0k forks, and it is recommended to open warehouse badge to view real-time values |
| Current Activity | README and MS Learn are both displayed as Microsoft the currently recommended new framework for Agent/Workflow; Warehouse 2026-06-30 still has updated records |
The project comes with key diagrams:
! Microsoft Agent Framework Banner
Video entry in the official README:
2. What does it mostly do?
The Microsoft Agent Framework provides two broad categories of capabilities:
| Category | Official Positioning | Pre-Sales Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | Use LLM to process input, invoke tools/MCP servers, generate responses | Build a single Intelligent Assistant or Task Agent |
| Workflows | Schema-based workflows, connecting agents and functions, and supporting type-safe routing, checkpoint, and auditing | Build controllable, recoverable, and auditable multi-step business processes |
Compared with the common Agent SDK, MAF emphasizes from prototype to production:
| Capabilities | Descriptions | Value to Customers |
|---|---|---|
| Python. NET dual stack | Python and C#/.NET framework support | Microsoft enterprise customers, mixed technology teams |
| Multi-model Provider | README mentions Microsoft Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI;MS Learn also lists Provider directions such as Anthropic and Ollama | Avoid binding a single model to facilitate architecture evolution |
| Graph-based Workflows | Sequential, concurrent, handoff, group collaboration and other modes | Complex processes can be explicitly modeled, not just multiple rounds of chat |
| Checkpoint / Resume | Workflows can be persisted, restored, and fault-tolerant for long tasks. | Suitable for long processes, approval processes, and batch processing. |
| Human-in-the-loop | Workflow can pause waiting for manual input and then continue execution. | High-risk scenarios are controllable and meet audit requirements. |
| Middleware | Request/response handling, exception handling, and custom pipeline | Enterprises can add authentication, logs, policies, and filtering |
| Observability | OpenTelemetry distributed tracking, monitoring, and debugging | Production O & M can see Agent/Tool/Workflow behavior |
| Foundry Hosted Agents | README says it can deploy to Foundry-hosted infrastructure with a small amount of code | Attractive to Azure/Microsoft Foundry customers |
| Declarative Agents | Defines agents in YAML for easy versioning and configuration | Suitable for team collaboration and environment variance management |
| Agent Skills | Build domain knowledge from files, inline code, class libraries, etc. for Agent use | Suitable for enterprise knowledge and tool capability precipitation |
| DevUI | Interactive development, testing, and debugging workflows | Shorten the development and debugging cycle and facilitate demo |
3. Relationship with AutoGen / Semantic Kernel
A large part of MAF's pre-sale value comes from the "official succession route".
The MS Learn overview makes it clear that the Agent Framework combines AutoGen simple Agent abstraction with enterprise-level Kernel-Semantic capabilities, such as session-based state management, type safety, middleware/filters, telemetry, and richer model and embedding support. It also adds a graph-based workflows for explicit multi-Agent execution path control.
| Source Item | Original Advantage | MAF Absorption/Evolution Direction |
|---|---|---|
| AutoGen | Simple, abstract, GroupChat, and event-driven Agent runtime for single-agent/multi-agent | More productive agents and Workflow,AutoGen user migration routes |
| Semantic Kernel | Enterprise features, plug-ins/tools, status, telemetry, and model ecosystem | Unified into the new Agent Framework, for production workflows |
| MAF | New Generation Unified Route | Python. NET,Agents Workflows,Foundry/Azure/OpenAI Ecosystem |
Pre-sales words:
"If the customer is still evaluating the AutoGen, it is time to directly include the Microsoft Agent Framework as a primary option, as it is Microsoft current new route to production-level Agents."
4. Core Competence List
| Agent creation | 'Agent' encapsulates models, instructions, tools, and session | Quickly build a task-based intelligent assistant | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Session State | Manage multiple rounds of context through AgentSession | Support continuous conversations and external state storage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tools/MCP | Agent Callable Functions, MCP servers, and hosted tools | Connect enterprise systems with external services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Streaming | Both Agent and client support streaming output | Improves the frontend experience and reduces wait time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Typed Workflows | Connect executor, agents, and functions in a type-safe manner | Reduce maintenance costs for complex processes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Request/Response | Workflows can initiate a human request and wait for a response | Suitable for approval, quality inspection, and compliance processes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Checkpointing | Capture executor state, shared state, message queue, and workflow position | Long tasks can be recovered, reducing the number of failed reruns | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OpenTelemetry | Agent, Workflow, Tool execution Tracking | Enterprise O & M, Audit, and Error-debugging | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Middleware | Intercept request/response, exception handling, custom pipeline | Enterprise governance, security policy, log tracking | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provider abstraction | Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, and more | Models are replaceable and reduce vendor lock-in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hosting samples | Azure Functions, Durable Task hosting, A2A, etc. | Help customers move from SDK to deployment |
5. What about Agents vs Workflows
MS Learn gives a good judgment standard:
When using agent... | Use Workflow when... |
|---|---|
| The task is open and conversational | The process has clear steps |
| Requires autonomous tool use and planning | Requires explicit control over execution order |
| A single LLM call or a tool call is enough. | Multiple agents or functions must work together. |
There is another sentence that is very useful before sales:
If you can use ordinary functions to handle tasks, use functions instead of AI for AI.
The pre-sales value behind this sentence is that MAF does not encourage turning everything into an Agent, but puts the Agent into the links that really require reasoning, tool invocation, and human-computer collaboration; The deterministic steps are still controlled by ordinary code/Workflow. This is more in line with the requirements of enterprise customers for stability, cost and controllability.
6. Architecture/deployment/integration approach
The typical architecture of MAF can be understood:
- Provider layer: Connect Microsoft Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, other model vendors.
- Agent layer: build Agent with model, instructions, tools and session.
- Tool/MCP layer: connect enterprise API, MCP Server, hosted tools, code interpreter, file retrieval, etc.
- Workflow layer: schema arrangement Agent, function, manual approval, checkpoint, branch routing.
- Observability/Governance layer: OpenTelemetry, middleware, log, policy, content filtering.
- Hosting tier: local development, Azure Functions, Durable Agents/Workflows, Foundry Hosted Agents, A2A.
When targeting Azure customers, focus on:
| Integration Points | Pre-Sales Meaning |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Foundry | Unified model, project, and managed agent capabilities |
| Azure OpenAI | Enterprise common model base |
| Azure Identity | Enterprise authentication routes |
| ManagedIdentityCredential | Safer authentication methods for production environments |
| Azure Functions / Durable Task | Serverless and persistent workflow deployment |
| OpenTelemetry | Access Enterprise Monitoring and Observable Platform |
How to use #7.
Python installation:
pip install agent-framework
pip install azure-identity
. NET installation:
dotnet add package Microsoft.Agents.AI
dotnet add package Microsoft.Agents.AI.Foundry
dotnet add package Azure.AI.Projects
dotnet add package Azure.Identity
Python Minimal Example:
import asyncio
from agent_framework import Agent
from agent_framework.foundry import FoundryChatClient
from azure.identity import AzureCliCredential
async def main():
client = FoundryChatClient(
credential=AzureCliCredential(),
# project_endpoint="https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com",
# model="gpt-4o",
)
agent = Agent(
client=client,
name="HelloAgent",
instructions="You are a friendly assistant. Keep your answers brief.",
)
result = await agent.run("What is the capital of France?")
print(result)
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Streaming output:
async for chunk in agent.run("Tell me a one-sentence fun fact.", stream=True):
if chunk.text:
print(chunk.text, end="", flush=True)
Note: MS Learn explicitly reminds the Agent that the '.env' file Framework not be loaded automatically; if'.env' is required, load_dotenv()'is explicitly called in the application'.
8. Applicable Scenario
| Scene | Fit | Description |
|---|---|---|
| New Agent platform for Microsoft/Azure customers | High | Foundry, Azure OpenAI, Azure Identity,. NET Ecological Match |
| AutoGen Migration | High | Official AutoGen to MAF Migration Guide |
| Semantic Kernel Migration/Upgrade | Gao | Official SK Migration Guide |
| Production-level multi-agent workflow | High | Graph workflow, checkpoint, human review, and observability are the core advantages |
| Enterprise internal process automation | High | You can combine common functions, agents, and manual approvals into Workflow |
| long task/asynchronous task | high | Checkpoint/resume, Durable hosting idea adaptation |
| Simple Chatbot | Medium and Low | MAF may be more important, and direct Chat API or lightweight SDK is simpler |
| Non-Microsoft technology stack customers | Python/OpenAI can still be used, but the ecological advantage will be weaker |
9. Not quite the scene
| Unsuitable point | Cause |
|---|---|
| Only one LLM call is required | The workflow/governance power of MAF will appear heavy |
| Customers do not use Azure/Microsoft ecosystem at all | MAF is still available, but the benefits of Foundry/.NET/Azure Identity are not obvious |
| Need a highly mature fully managed business platform | MAF is an open source framework/SDK, and still needs to build an application layer and operation and maintenance system |
| Full zero risk tolerance for third-party tools | README clearly indicates that third-party systems, non-Azure models, MCP/tool use are subject to self-risk and governance |
| All provider are required to be equally mature | Some provider/capabilities in the migration guide are still in planned status and need to be confirmed item by item |
10. What can I say before sales
One-sentence positioning:
"Microsoft Agent Framework is a new generation framework for Microsoft current production-level Agent and multi-Agent workflows, unifying AutoGen multi-Agent thinking with Kernel-Semantic enterprise capabilities, and is suitable for moving from prototype to governed, observable, and recoverable enterprise-level Agent applications."
Customer Value:
| Customer Pain Points | MAF Value |
|---|---|
| AutoGen enters maintenance mode, do not know what to choose for the new project | MAF is the official succession route with migration guide |
| Agent demo can run, but production is uncontrollable | Workflow, checkpoint, human review, middleware, observability provide engineering control surface |
| Python and. NET teams do one set each | MAF provides Python C#/.NET consistent framework |
| Enterprise to Azure/Foundry integration | Native support Foundry, Azure OpenAI, Azure Identity |
| Multi-Agent is too "black box". | Schema Workflow explicitly express the execution path, which is convenient for auditing and debugging. |
| Worry about the risk of tool invocation | Governance can be designed through middleware, human-in-the-loop, and permission boundaries |
11. Comparison with AutoGen / CrewAI / LangGraph
| Frame | More suitable | Difference point of MAF |
|---|---|---|
| AutoGen | Existing Project Maintenance, Historical Multi-Agent Prototype | AutoGen maintenance mode;MAF is a new route recommended by Microsoft |
| CrewAI | Python multi-agent automation, role/task/team representation | MAF is more Microsoft to/Azure/.NET production governance and typed workflows |
| LangGraph | LangChain ecology, statecharts, and controllable Agent Workflow | MAF is more closely integrated with Foundry/Azure/.NET/AutoGen/SK migration |
| Semantic Kernel | Existing SK plug-in/Planner/enterprise semantic orchestration | MAF can be regarded as a new framework of Agent/Workflow after the integration of SK AutoGen experience |
Pre-sales advice:
- If the customer is an Azure/Microsoft ecosystem, MAF should have priority access to the scenario.
- If the customer already has a AutoGen,MAF is the main migration line.
- If the customer is a pure Python, non-Azure, partial business automation demo, you can compare CrewAI at the same time.
- If the customer already has a LangChain/LangGraph ecosystem, it needs to be selected from model Provider, state management, workflow governance, and deployment requirements.
12. PoC Recommendations
MAF PoC does not recommend only "Hello Agent", but should choose a process that can reflect the production capacity.
| PoC Items | Design Method | Acceptance Index |
|---|---|---|
| AutoGen migration sample | Select a AutoGen AssistantAgent/GroupChat to move to MAF | Improvement of amount, functional equivalence, observability |
| Approval Process for Human Review | Agent Generates Proposals, Workflow Suspends for Human Approval | Controllability and Recovery of Human Review Nodes |
| Long task checkpoint | Design a multi-step document analysis/report process to recover from a failure in the middle of the process | Whether it can be recovered from the checkpoint without repeated consumption |
| Azure Foundry Agent | Build an Enterprise Agent with FoundryChatClient | Azure authentication, model call, deployment path |
| Multi-Agent Workflow | Research, analysis, review, and execution of different agents/functions | Cost, latency, completion rate, interpretability |
| OpenTelemetry Observation | Access OTEL collector or Enterprise Monitoring Platform | Trace Integrity, Tool Call Visibility |
Suggested indicators:
| Indicator | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| End-to-End Completion Rate | Whether the Agent Workflow completes real business tasks | |
| Recovery ability | Whether to continue from checkpoint after interruption | |
| Human Review Efficiency | Whether the manual review can be suspended/resumed | |
| Observability | Whether agents, tools, and Workflow traces can be seen | |
| Security Boundaries | Whether third-party tools and data streams are audited and restricted | |
| Cost | token, tool call, and cloud resource cost | |
| Migration cost | AutoGen/SK existing code modifications |
13. Risks and Considerations
- The GitHub API is anonymously throttling this time: The GitHub API failed to verify the stars, forks, and latest GitHub release again. The package version in the note uses PyPI/NuGet to query the results.
- Third-party system risk: README Important Note clearly states that third-party servers, agents, code, and non-Azure Direct models are all subject to customer risk, review data flow and cost.
- Be cautious with Azure certification: MS Learn reminds that 'DefaultAzureCredential' is easy to develop, but production recommends using more explicit credential, such as Managed Identity.
- Provider capabilities are not completely equivalent: some provider/capabilities in the AutoGen migration guide are still planned and need to be confirmed item by item.
- SDK is not a complete platform: MAF provides framework and samples, and production still requires application layer permissions, auditing, UI, CI/CD, deployment and monitoring.
- AI the boundary of responsibility: the customer needs to implement Responsible AI mitigation measures such as metaprompt, content filters, safety evaluation, quality control, etc.
- The framework is still evolving rapidly: PyPI/NuGet versions are updated faster, and production PoC requires fixed versions and upgrade policies.
14. Frequently Asked Customer Questions
| MAF is a substitute for AutoGen? | It can be understood. The official documentation describes it as the next generation direction for AutoGen and Semantic kernels, and provides AutoGen migration guidelines. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| and CrewAI how to choose? | Azure/.NET/Microsoft Foundry/production governance gives priority to MAF;Python multi-Agent automation, role task expression and fast business demo can be compared with CrewAI. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Does the local model support? | The MS Learn provider overview mentions Provider such as Ollama, but the specific maturity and functionality are verified with the current document/sample. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Can we only use OpenAI instead of Azure? | Both README and migration guide mention OpenAI Provider. However, the Microsoft ecological advantages of MAF are more obvious in Azure/Foundry scenarios. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Can multi-agent be used? | Yes, the graph-based workflows, group collaboration, Magentic, and other modes are supported, and Python/.NET samples are available. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| What is the most important capability in production? | checkpoint, human-in-the-loop, OpenTelemetry, middleware, Azure Identity, hosting samples. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Does it have a complete console out of the box? | It has DevUI and samples, but it is not a complete business platform. Production applications still need to build their own front-end, permission, audit and deployment systems. |
15. My Pre-Sales Judgment
Microsoft Agent Framework is the most important Agent framework in the current Microsoft ecology. Its positioning is very clear: not to make another Agent demo framework, but to make infrastructure for enterprises to push Agent from demo to production. It combines AutoGen multi-Agent thinking, Kernel-Semantic enterprise engineering capabilities, and Azure/Foundry deployment ecology into one line.
If the customer is already in the Microsoft ecosystem, MAF is a very natural recommended path. Especially when customers mention these keywords: Azure OpenAI, Microsoft Foundry,. NET, AutoGen migration, production-level workflow, observable, human review, long task recovery, and corporate governance can all put MAF at the core of the program.
However, if the customer just wants to be a simple chat robot quickly, MAF may be biased. If the customer does not touch the Microsoft ecology at all, he should also make a horizontal comparison with CrewAI, LangGraph, etc. When it comes to pre-sales promotion, the best entry point is not "it can write a poem", but "it can put the Agent into a recoverable, auditable, and human-intervention business process".
16. REFERENCE
-GitHub: https://github.com/microsoft/agent-framework
-MS Learn Documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/
-Framework Overview: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/overview/agent-framework-overview
-Quick Start: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/tutorials/quick-start
-AutoGen Migration Guide: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/migration-guide/from-autogen/
-Semantic Kernel Migration Guide: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/migration-guide/from-semantic-kernel
-PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/agent-framework/
-NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/profiles/MicrosoftAgentFramework/